Google has unveiled a proposal aimed at addressing the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) antitrust lawsuit following a significant court ruling against the tech giant. While the DOJ is pressing for drastic structural changes, including selling its Chrome browser and possibly Android, Google’s counter-proposal centers on providing more flexibility to browsers and device manufacturers in choosing search engine defaults.

The Conflict

In October 2020, the DOJ, along with several state attorneys general, sued Google, accusing the company of using monopolistic practices to maintain dominance in search services and advertising. After years of litigation, Judge Amit Mehta ruled in September 2024 that Google violated antitrust laws, marking a major victory for the DOJ.

The DOJ’s remedy demands include:

• The mandatory sale of Google’s Chrome browser.
• The potential sale of the Android operating system if other measures fail to ensure fair competition.
• Restrictions on exclusive agreements.
• Mandatory data-sharing with competitors.
• Oversight through a technical compliance committee.

Google’s Position

Google has rejected the DOJ’s demands as overreach, arguing they would dismantle critical components of its ecosystem and stifle innovation. Kent Walker, Google’s President of Global Affairs, called the DOJ’s demands a “radical interventionist agenda,” asserting they would “break a range of Google products.”

Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, emphasized that the case revolves around contracts rather than broader competition issues. Google maintains its market success stems from delivering superior products and user experiences, rather than unfair competitive practices. In its legal filing, the company stated:

“People don’t use Google because they have to — they use it because they want to.”

Google’s Proposed Remedies

In its counter-proposal, Google suggests adjustments to its search distribution agreements rather than the divestitures demanded by the DOJ. Key elements include:

• Browser Agreements: Companies like Apple and Mozilla would gain the ability to negotiate multiple default search engine agreements across their platforms.
• Android Contracts: Device manufacturers would have greater flexibility to preload multiple search engines and Google apps independently.
• Oversight and Compliance: A monitoring system to ensure compliance with the agreed changes.

Next Steps

The court has scheduled a remedies hearing for April, during which Google plans to appeal the initial ruling. While the DOJ seeks sweeping reforms, Google’s proposal focuses narrowly on the court’s findings regarding search contracts.

Implications

The resolution of this case could significantly reshape the search engine market and Google’s business model. A DOJ victory could weaken Google’s grip on search dominance, while a compromise may maintain its market power with added oversight. The tech world and consumers alike await the next developments in this landmark antitrust battle.

If you’re still finding it all difficult and confusing, check out our monthly SEO packages and let the experts help you!