Google’s SearchLiaison responded to an inquiry seeking guidance on diagnosing content that has experienced a drop in rankings due to the Helpful Content update. In their response, SearchLiaison advised taking a step back and evaluating the situation to determine if there is an issue and, if so, what it might be.

Addressing Queries Regarding HCU-Affected Page Remediation

A user on X (formerly Twitter) expressed frustration with the guidance provided by SEO experts, given the misconception – later clarified as erroneous – that the Helpful Content update affects entire websites. This misunderstanding complicates the process of pinpointing specific pages requiring adjustments. Lee Funke (@FitFoodieFinds) tweeted:

“SEO advice keeps pointing to ‘examining pages with significant drops’ to identify issues. However, if HCU impacted us site-wide, every page saw a decline, making it challenging to differentiate between helpful and unhelpful content. Any suggestions?”

SearchLiaison Clarifies Misconceptions About HCU Functionality

In response to inquiries regarding the functionality of the Helpful Content update (HCU), SearchLiaison addressed common misconceptions. He first tackled the notion that the update operates as a singular signal, highlighting the diversified approach outlined in a recent Search Central blog post:

“Our Search Central blog post emphasized that the traditional understanding of the helpful content system has evolved significantly. Rather than relying on a single signal, we’ve enriched our core ranking systems with various innovative signals and methods to deliver more helpful results.”

Furthermore, SearchLiaison clarified that the HCU no longer functions as a site-wide signal but operates at the page level, contrary to previous assumptions:

“The updated FAQ page elucidates this shift, emphasizing that the HCU now operates on a page-level basis. Our core ranking systems are predominantly tailored to evaluate individual pages, utilizing many signals and systems to gauge their helpfulness. While page-level assessment is primary, we consider certain site-wide signals.”

Understanding Ranking Drops: Not Always an Indication of Page Fixes

Another crucial piece of advice is the recognition that a decline in rankings doesn’t automatically signify a need for corrective action. This is a pertinent observation. Website publishers and SEO professionals often hastily assume that rectification is imperative, overlooking the possibility of relevance-related issues. When ranking drops are due to relevance, recovery might be possible, but in severe instances, the previous rankings may never be restored. Distinguishing between these scenarios requires expertise.

In a tweet, SearchLiaison elaborated on this aspect:

“Regarding questions about widespread drops in rankings, it’s important to acknowledge that various factors can contribute, including instances where other content appears more relevant and therefore ranks higher.”

He also referenced an earlier tweet advising patience until the update completes its rollout and highlighted that rankings can fluctuate independently and be influenced by user behavior, not solely by ranking adjustments:

“For further insights, I discussed the importance of waiting until the update concludes its rollout before initiating changes. Additionally, rankings can spontaneously shift, unaffected by alterations, and user trends can significantly impact site traffic, independent of ranking adjustments.”

Evaluating Pages Affected by Ranking Drops

In response to Lee Funke’s query (@FitFoodieFinds), SearchLiaison recommended a proactive approach to address pages experiencing reduced traffic. He advised focusing on self-assessment of these pages, utilizing resources such as the Helpful Content FAQ documentation and the HCU Self-Assessment page for guidance.

In a tweet, SearchLiaison elaborated:

“If the decline in traffic is significant, consider assessing pages that previously attracted substantial visits. Use resources like the FAQ page to evaluate their helpfulness to your audience. If deemed beneficial, proceed accordingly.”

Deciphering Google’s FAQ on HCU: A Matter of Clarity

Following the initial query, the conversation delved into concerns regarding potential contradictions within Google’s FAQ regarding the Helpful Content Update (HCU). The individual initiating the discussion highlighted perceived discrepancies between the assertion that Helpful Content signals operate primarily at a page level and the suggestion that site-wide factors can impact overall performance.

Expressing their confusion, the individual tweeted:

“I find the HCU FAQ somewhat contradictory. It states that signals operate primarily on a page level yet suggests that unhelpful/thin content can adversely affect other pages, which seems site-wide. I’m struggling to grasp what caused these significant drops!”

While the FAQ doesn’t explicitly mention thin content, it does touch upon the notion of unhelpful content impacting other pages beyond the page level. Quoting from the FAQ:

“Our systems primarily function at the page level to prioritize the most helpful content, even if the site hosts unhelpful content elsewhere. However, a considerable amount of unhelpful content may diminish the performance of other pages in Search to varying extents. Removing such content may enhance the performance of your other pages.”

This passage, albeit somewhat vague, raises pertinent questions:

• Does Google suggest that an abundance of unhelpful content on a website could overshadow the value of a few helpful pages?
• Is Google implying that a website inundated with predominantly unhelpful content would need help to garner links or user engagement, hindering the discovery of valuable content?

The sentiment is not unfounded that Google’s documentation could benefit from more precise elucidation.

Deciphering Google’s FAQ on HCU: A Matter of Clarity

Following the initial query, the conversation delved into concerns regarding potential contradictions within Google’s FAQ regarding the Helpful Content Update (HCU). The individual initiating the discussion highlighted perceived discrepancies between the assertion that Helpful Content signals operate primarily at a page level and the suggestion that site-wide factors can impact overall performance.

Expressing their confusion, the individual tweeted:

“I find the HCU FAQ somewhat contradictory. It states that signals operate primarily on a page level yet suggests that unhelpful/thin content can adversely affect other pages, which seems site-wide. I’m struggling to grasp what caused these significant drops!”

While the FAQ doesn’t explicitly mention thin content, it does touch upon the notion of unhelpful content impacting other pages beyond the page level. Quoting from the FAQ:

“Our systems primarily function at the page level to prioritize the most helpful content, even if the site hosts unhelpful content elsewhere. However, a considerable amount of unhelpful content may diminish the performance of other pages in Search to varying extents. Removing such content may enhance the performance of your other pages.”

This passage, albeit somewhat vague, raises pertinent questions:

• Does Google suggest that an abundance of unhelpful content on a website could overshadow the value of a few helpful pages?
• Is Google implying that a website inundated with predominantly unhelpful content would need help to garner links or user engagement, hindering the discovery of valuable content?

The sentiment is not unfounded that Google’s documentation could benefit from more precise elucidation.

Deciphering Google’s FAQ on HCU: A Matter of Clarity

Following the initial query, the conversation delved into concerns regarding potential contradictions within Google’s FAQ regarding the Helpful Content Update (HCU). The individual initiating the discussion highlighted perceived discrepancies between the assertion that Helpful Content signals operate primarily at a page level and the suggestion that site-wide factors can impact overall performance.

Expressing their confusion, the individual tweeted:

“I find the HCU FAQ somewhat contradictory. It states that signals operate primarily on a page level yet suggests that unhelpful/thin content can adversely affect other pages, which seems site-wide. I’m struggling to grasp what caused these significant drops!”

While the FAQ doesn’t explicitly mention thin content, it does touch upon the notion of unhelpful content impacting other pages beyond the page level. Quoting from the FAQ:

“Our systems primarily function at the page level to prioritize the most helpful content, even if the site hosts unhelpful content elsewhere. However, a considerable amount of unhelpful content may diminish the performance of other pages in Search to varying extents. Removing such content may enhance the performance of your other pages.”

This passage, albeit somewhat vague, raises pertinent questions:

• Does Google suggest that an abundance of unhelpful content on a website could overshadow the value of a few helpful pages?
• Is Google implying that a website inundated with predominantly unhelpful content would need help to garner links or user engagement, hindering the discovery of valuable content?

The sentiment is not unfounded that Google’s documentation could benefit from more precise elucidation. 

If you still find it all difficult and confusing then check out our monthly SEO packages and let the experts help you.