Rendering plays a critical role in how websites perform and rank in search engines. In a recent episode of Google’s Search Central Lightning Talks, Martin Splitt, Developer Advocate at Google, dives deep into rendering strategies, their impact on SEO, and actionable tips for web developers.
From the pros and cons of pre-rendering, server-side rendering (SSR), and client-side rendering (CSR), Splitt offers invaluable insights into optimizing websites for both users and search engines.
This episode also ties into broader discussions about the challenges of excessive JavaScript use, particularly for AI-driven search crawlers like GPTBot, which often struggle with JavaScript-heavy sites.
What Is Rendering?
In simple terms, rendering refers to the process of turning data into a visual format for users. As Splitt explains:
“Rendering in this context is the process of pulling data into a template. There are different strategies as to where and when this happens, so let’s take a look together.”
In earlier web development, rendering involved manually editing and uploading HTML files. Today, modern websites use templates to create pages with dynamic or static content, making rendering an essential component of web development.
Splitt categorizes rendering into three main strategies:
- Pre-Rendering (Static Site Generation)
- Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
- Client-Side Rendering (CSR)
- Pre-Rendering: Simplicity and Security
Also known as static site generation, pre-rendering involves generating HTML files in advance and serving them directly to users. Splitt highlights the benefits:
“It’s very robust and secure, as there isn’t much interaction with the server, allowing you to lock it down tightly.”
However, he acknowledges its limitations:
“It can’t respond to interactions from your visitors, limiting what you can do on your website.”
Tools like Jekyll, Hugo, and Gatsby automate pre-rendering by combining templates and content into static files.
Advantages:
- Simple setup with minimal server requirements
- High security due to limited server interaction
- Reliable performance
Disadvantages:
- Requires manual or automated updates for content changes
- Limited interactivity, as pages can’t dynamically respond to user actions
1. Server-Side Rendering (SSR): Flexibility with Trade-Offs
Server-side rendering generates pages dynamically for each user request, enabling personalized content and interactive features.
“The program decides on factors like the URL, visitor, cookies, and other inputs to determine what content to serve,” Splitt explains.
While SSR offers flexibility:
“It can respond to a user’s login status or actions like signing up for a newsletter,” it requires more resources and security measures to handle user inputs safely.
Advantages:
- Supports dynamic, personalized interactions
- Handles user-generated content like reviews and comments
Disadvantages:
- Complex setup and ongoing maintenance
- Higher server resource consumption
- Slower load times without caching or optimization
To mitigate resource strain, developers can use caching or proxy servers to reduce redundant processing.
2. Client-Side Rendering (CSR): Interactivity with Risks
Client-side rendering relies on JavaScript to fetch and display content in the user’s browser. This approach powers interactive web applications with real-time updates.
Splitt notes the benefits of CSR:
“The interactions feel app-like, happening smoothly without visible page reloads.”
But he also warns about potential pitfalls:
“If something goes wrong during transmission, users might see blank pages, which can impact SEO.”
Advantages:
- Smooth, app-like user experience
- Enables advanced features like offline access via PWAs
Disadvantages:
- SEO challenges if search engines struggle to process JavaScript-rendered content
- Heavier reliance on users’ devices and browsers
- Risk of blank screens if JavaScript fails to load
To address these challenges, Splitt suggests a hybrid approach like hydration, where the server renders initial content, and client-side rendering handles subsequent interactions.
Choosing the Right Rendering Strategy
Splitt emphasizes there’s no universal solution—developers must tailor rendering strategies to their website’s needs.
“It depends on factors like what your website does, how often the content changes, the interactions you want to support, and the resources you have to build and maintain it.”
He provides a visual summary of the pros and cons of each and every approach, helping developers make informed decisions.
The Bigger Picture: Rendering and JavaScript Overuse
This episode continues conversations about the downsides of excessive JavaScript, especially for AI-driven crawlers like GPTBot, which may struggle with JavaScript-heavy sites.
Splitt advises using server-side rendering or pre-rendering to ensure essential content is accessible to users and search engines. Additionally, developers are encouraged to adopt progressive enhancement and limit JavaScript to functionalities that add genuine value.
By understanding and applying the right rendering strategies, developers can improve website performance, user experience, and SEO outcomes in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
If you’re still feeling overwhelmed and confused, check out our monthly SEO packages and let the experts handle it for you!
