As legitimate websites navigated the fluctuations by Google’s March 2024 update, SEO professionals and culinary bloggers observed a notable surge in AI-generated spam sites claiming top positions in search results. For instance, a specific instance appeared in over 217,000 queries yesterday, with 14,900 of them securing a position within the top 10 – a number that has since escalated. This trend sheds light on the ongoing challenge of how spammers persist in outmaneuvering Google’s defenses.

Surge In March 2024: AI Spam Subdomain Rises Despite Google’s Efforts

Amidst Google’s March 2024 update, a subdomain has unexpectedly risen to prominence, marking a concerning development in the battle against spam. The primary domain, established in the summer of 2020, appears innocuous, but its spammy subdomain, initially identified by the Internet Archive on November 30, 2022, remained dormant until March 2024. Suddenly, it expanded rapidly, seizing top positions in search results for thousands of queries.

On Wednesday, March 20, the subdomain claimed 14.9 thousand top 10 search query rankings. By Thursday, March 21, this number had escalated to 15.6 thousand. Despite Google’s recent spam update, sites like this persist in dominating search results, leaving Google seemingly unable to curb their influence.

Food Writer’s Reaction to AI Spam Dominance

Renowned food writer and cookbook author Robin Donovan (Instagram handle) recently drew attention to the proliferation of AI-generated content in recipe search results. She expressed dismay over the surge of AI sites outranking seasoned experts, which caused frustration among members of a private Facebook group dedicated to culinary professionals.

According to Donovan, the AI-generated content is glaringly apparent, including the accompanying images, which are entirely AI-generated. This dominance by AI-generated content is particularly disheartening for individuals like Donovan, who have dedicated years to honing their expertise and authority in the field.

Expressing her frustration, Donovan exclaimed, “How on earth is this considered the best content?” She highlighted the plight of professionally trained chefs, recipe developers, and cookbook authors, whose meticulously crafted content is overshadowed by AI-generated material.

These experts have diligently followed Google’s guidelines for years, investing significant time and effort into producing original, high-quality content. However, despite their adherence to Google’s recommendations, their sites are being adversely affected by the rise of AI-generated spam.

Donovan emphasized the extensive preparation and expertise behind the content created by culinary professionals, contrasting it with the seemingly arbitrary success of AI-generated material. This discrepancy raises questions about the efficacy of Google’s ranking algorithms and the challenges faced by legitimate content creators in an increasingly AI-dominated landscape.

Insights into AI Spam Sites and Their Tactics

1. Hosted on Squarespace: The observed surge in AI spam sites hosted on Squarespace subdomains prompts speculation about the platform’s perceived legitimacy in Google’s eyes, although this remains speculative.
2. Colorful and Simplistic Images: Each article is accompanied by AI-generated images featuring vibrant colors and simplistic designs reminiscent of infographics. This intentional choice aims to capture attention in search results and enhance visibility on platforms like Google Discover.
3. Rigid Template for Articles: Articles adhere to a structured template, ranging from health benefits to lifestyle advice. The template ensures uniformity across content types, offering readers consistent formatting and information presentation.
4. AI-Generated Article Prompts: An example prompt for generating health and diet articles reveals a systematic approach, guiding content creation to cover various aspects comprehensively.
5. AI Checker Tool Results: Testing with AI content detection tools consistently flags these articles as AI-generated, indicating a lack of human authorship markers and originality.
6. Ranking Strategy: The observed ranking strategy involves exploiting a loophole in Google’s algorithms, capitalizing on the initial boost new content receives. This strategy aligns with a traditional “churn and burn” approach, where continuous publication ensures a perpetual cycle of boosted rankings.
7. Longstanding Issue: Google has grappled with AI-generated spam for some time, and instances like the one described are not isolated incidents. Closing loopholes to combat such spam poses challenges, potentially negatively impacting legitimate sites.
8. Call for Action: The prevalence of AI-generated spam underscores the need for Google to address the issue to protect the integrity of search results and support legitimate content creators. The failure to address such spam undermines the efforts of expert authors and erodes public trust in Google’s search quality.

If navigating these concepts feels overwhelming, consider exploring our monthly SEO packages. Our team of experts is ready to help you optimize your online presence.